Assignment: Doctoral Study Business Problem, management homework help

/in /by

Get perfect grades by consistently using our affordable writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

A Doctoral Study Problem Statement is one of the most important components of your Doctoral Study. It provides the reader with an understanding of the purpose for and importance of the research by identifying the specific business problem you intend to address. For this Assignment, you will submit a draft of your Doctoral Study Problem Statement that demonstrates a comprehensive problem to be studied.

To prepare for this Assignment, review the “Formulating a Doctoral Problem Statement” presentation provided in the week’s Required Readings. Be sure to utilize the Walden Library and Online Writing Center for guidance in identifying scholarly resources and related examples.

By Day 3

Submit a 150-word Doctoral Study Problem Statement that includes the following:

  • Hook (with APA citation)
  • Anchor (with APA citation)
  • General Business Problem
  • Specific Business Problem

Note: Be sure to use the APA Course Paper Template (6th ed.), found in this week’s Learning Resources, to complete this Assignment. Also, refer to the Week 8 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

Name: DDBA_8161_Week_8_Assignment_Rubric

Superior Criteria Excellent Criteria Satisfactory Criteria Marginal Criteria Unsatisfactory Criteria Not Submitted
Element 1: Hook Points: 18 (18%)

Student presents a well-written hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are no errors.

Feedback:

Points: 17.1 (17.1%)

Student presents a well-written hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are one or two minor errors.

Feedback:

Points: 15.3 (15.3%)

Student presents a hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation; however, the hook does not provide sufficient impact and/or the citation is not current or relevant to problem statement.

Feedback:

Points: 13.5 (13.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete hook (WOW statement) statement. The hook statement is not appropriate for the problem statement and/or is missing the citation.

Feedback:

Points: 9 (9%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 2: Anchor

Points: 18 (18%)

Student presents a well-written anchor statement that demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are no errors.

Feedback:

Points: 17.1 (17.1%)

Student presents a well-written anchor statement that demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are one or two minor errors.

Feedback:

Points: 15.3 (15.3%)

Student presents an anchor statement that somewhat demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation; however, the anchor does not provide a number demonstrating the magnitude of the business problem and/or the citation is not current or relevant to problem statement.

Feedback:

Points: 13.5 (13.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete anchor statement. The anchor statement is not appropriate for the problem statement and/or is missing the citation.

Feedback:

Points: 9 (9%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 3: Plan – General Business Problem

Points: 18 (18%)

Student presents a well-written general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are no errors.

Feedback:

Points: 17.1 (17.1%)

Student presents a well-written general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are one or two minor errors.

Feedback:

Points: 15.3 (15.3%)

Student presents a general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business; however, the general business problem is not clear, is missing some details, and/or is not relevant to leaders in business.

Feedback:

Points: 13.5 (13.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete general business statement. The general business statement does not identify a business problem and/or does align to the hook and anchor statements.

Feedback:

Points: 9 (9%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 4: Plan – Specific Business Problem

Points: 18 (18%)

Student presents a well-written specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are no errors.

Feedback:

Points: 17.1 (17.1%)

Student presents a well-written specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are one or two minor errors.

Feedback:

Points: 15.3 (15.3%)

Student presents a specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business; however, the general business problem is not clear, is missing some details, and/or is not relevant to leaders in business.

Feedback:

Points: 13.5 (13.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete specific business statement. The general business statement does not identify a business problem and/or does align to the hook and anchor statements.

Feedback:

Points: 9 (9%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 5: Written Delivery Style & Grammar

Points: 14 (14%)

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

Feedback:

Points: 13.3 (13.3%)

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

Feedback:

Points: 11.9 (11.9%)

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

Feedback:

Points: 10.5 (10.5%)

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

Feedback:

Points: 7 (7%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 6: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)

Points: 14 (14%)

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

Feedback:

Points: 13.3 (13.3%)

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

Feedback:

Points: 11.9 (11.9%)

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

Feedback:

Points: 10.5 (10.5%)

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

Feedback:

Points: 7 (7%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

Feedback:

Points: 0 (0%)

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 1: Hook—

Levels of Achievement:

18 (18%) points

Student presents a well-written hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are no errors.

17.1 (17.1%) points

Student presents a well-written hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are one or two minor errors.

15.3 (15.3%) points

Student presents a hook (WOW statement) statement that includes a correctly formatted APA citation; however, the hook does not provide sufficient impact and/or the citation is not current or relevant to problem statement.

13.5 (13.5%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete hook (WOW statement) statement. The hook statement is not appropriate for the problem statement and/or is missing the citation.

9 (9%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 2: Anchor—

Levels of Achievement:

18 (18%) points

Student presents a well-written anchor statement that demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are no errors.

17.1 (17.1%) points

Student presents a well-written anchor statement that demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation. There are one or two minor errors.

15.3 (15.3%) points

Student presents an anchor statement that somewhat demonstrates the magnitude of the business problem and includes a correctly formatted APA citation; however, the anchor does not provide a number demonstrating the magnitude of the business problem and/or the citation is not current or relevant to problem statement.

13.5 (13.5%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete anchor statement. The anchor statement is not appropriate for the problem statement and/or is missing the citation.

9 (9%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 3: Plan – General Business Problem—

Levels of Achievement:

18 (18%) points

Student presents a well-written general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are no errors.

17.1 (17.1%) points

Student presents a well-written general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are one or two minor errors.

15.3 (15.3%) points

Student presents a general business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business; however, the general business problem is not clear, is missing some details, and/or is not relevant to leaders in business.

13.5 (13.5%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete general business statement. The general business statement does not identify a business problem and/or does align to the hook and anchor statements.

9 (9%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 4: Plan – Specific Business Problem—

Levels of Achievement:

18 (18%) points

Student presents a well-written specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are no errors.

17.1 (17.1%) points

Student presents a well-written specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business. There are one or two minor errors.

15.3 (15.3%) points

Student presents a specific business problem that identifies an over-arching business problem that exists in business; however, the general business problem is not clear, is missing some details, and/or is not relevant to leaders in business.

13.5 (13.5%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete specific business statement. The general business statement does not identify a business problem and/or does align to the hook and anchor statements.

9 (9%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 5: Written Delivery Style & Grammar—

Levels of Achievement:

14 (14%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

13.3 (13.3%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

11.9 (11.9%) points

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

10.5 (10.5%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

7 (7%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 6: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)—

Levels of Achievement:

14 (14%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

13.3 (13.3%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

11.9 (11.9%) points

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

10.5 (10.5%) points

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

7 (7%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Name: DDBA_8161_Week_8_Assignment_Rubric

Have your paper completed by a writing expert today and enjoy posting excellent grades. Place your order in a very easy process. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper