This is a question in my finance class. I need this to be 140 words in your own words. If not in your own words please cite and give a reference. NO Plagarism Please
Class: Nice argument for accepting a project with zero NPV. But what happens when a federal regulation imposes a mandate on a company to build a desalination plant because it improves the environment for certain fish species even though the project has a negative NPV?
The option are (1) build it, (2) not build it and get fined and (3) get out of that business. Which is the lesser evil?