Do all no Plagiarism 1.Discussion: Neutrality in World War II. Following World War I many in the United States supported isolationism, believing the United States should focus on diplomatic affairs.

Get perfect grades by consistently using our affordable writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Do all no Plagiarism

1.Discussion: Neutrality in World War II.

Following World War I many in the United States supported isolationism, believing the United States should focus on diplomatic affairs. As the world began to plunge into war again in the late 1930s, the United States to steps to ensure neutrality. However, this would gradually change. After reading the articles, answer the following questions:

Why did Americans support isolationism and neutrality? Was the United States ever truly neutral in World War II? How and why did the country gradually move away from neutrality? If the Japanese had not attacked Pearl Harbor, do you believe the country would have ever entered in the war?

To receive full credit for this assignment your post must:

Address the questions asked in the paragraph above in at least a 300-word post and cite all outside sources appropriately

In your initial post, include at least one interesting question the readings raised for you

2.One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary documents, scholarly secondary sources, and then creating an analysis (or interpretation) of this research. This assignment will allow you to create your own interpretation of the homefront in WWII. Your response should be at least 300 words and contain your analysis, reaction, or connection to a specific issue within the historical narrative that you find compelling. For full credit, your paper must not simply sum up the reading or repeat points made there. Rather, I’m looking for you to create your own interpretation, explain the emotional content of the piece, or discuss some original insight. Include citations as needed. Historians of the same time period vary their research topics in order for us to gain a richer and fuller picture of the past and so that our understanding of the past will be as accurate and complete as possible. In the interest of allowing you, as young historians, to follow your own interests, please select one of the following topics to address.

Propaganda:  After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of the War Relocation Authority and the experience of Japanese-Americans in WWII. You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them:  To what extent did the US perceive Japanese-Americans to be a threat to safety and security? Was this perception valid or not? Are you surprised that those within the camp would join the military?

WWII Japanese Experiance:  After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of the American homefront during World War II. You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them:  How were people on the home front encouraged to participate in the war effort? Which of the posters do you think was most effective? In what ways were people’s part in the war impactful? Where can you still see evidence of these behaviors?

3.Discussion: All Americans Fought the War.

Millions of Americans participated in World War II, either through the military or through newly created agencies. After reading the article from First Lady Roosevelt and the data on American participation, please pick one group of Americans to focus your discussion on. Your post should answer the following questions, but you are not limited to them:

Which group of Americans are you focusing on? Consider if this group of Americans had full civil rights in the United States at the time of the war and if not, why would this group be willing to join the war effort? What was the most important contribution to the war effort of your group?

To receive full credit for this assignment your post must:

Address the questions asked in the paragraph above in at least a 300-word post and cite all outside sources appropriately

In your initial post, include at least one interesting question the readings raised for you

4.One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary documents, scholarly secondary sources, and then creating an analysis (or interpretation) of this research. This assignment will allow you to create your own interpretation of the fighting during WWII. Your response should be at least 300 words and contain your analysis, reaction, or connection to a specific issue within the historical narrative that you find compelling. For full credit, your paper must not simply sum up the reading or repeat points made there. Rather, I’m looking for you to create your own interpretation, explain the emotional content of the piece, or discuss some original insight. Include citations as needed. Historians of the same time period vary their research topics in order for us to gain a richer and fuller picture of the past and so that our understanding of the past will be as accurate and complete as possible. In the interest of allowing you, as young historians, to follow your own interests, please select one of the following topics to address.

The War with Japan: Since 1945, Americans have been debating the necessity of dropping the atomic bombs.  Many historians argue that dropping the bombs was necessary to end the war, saved American and Japanese lives, and avoided an invasion of Japan.  Other historians believe Japan would have likely surrendered without the use of the bombs.  After reading the text and viewing the materials provided, please answer the following questions:  Why do you believe the aggression of the Japanese in the World War II-era is less known than the Holocaust?  Do you believe the attack on Nanking and other such Japanese attacks influenced the Americans to drop the bombs?  Was the United States justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan?  Why or why not?

Camp Liberation: After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of the liberation of the concentration camps. You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them:  What themes do you see across the letter and interviews that you reviewed. How were the soldiers emotionally prepared for what they would see? What were the long-term impacts on the soldiers? How did soldiers cope with their experiences?

Have your paper completed by a writing expert today and enjoy posting excellent grades. Place your order in a very easy process. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper