please I have attached 4 document

please I have attached 4 document
Two assignment but connected Assignment 1: Instructions: Review your collection plan submitted in Week 1. You will write a short 2-3 page paper. Task: Write a review of your collection plan and techniques, answering the following. Identify if your collection plan and techniques have changed since your initial collection plan was created. Identify why the techniques used initially may vary from what you would use today. What if any, interesting fact have you gained from the discussion questions?   *Please refer to the APA template for assignment submission. I will attached also my collection plan and techniques from week one like my organization Also I ill post at the end the different question which have been discussed during the semester to give you a idea for the question 3 Assignment 2 Instructions:  Write a short 2-3 page paper based on the organization you selected in week 1. Task: You are an analyst, and you need to describe the following to your supervisors: Identify why you need to report your findings. How should the findings be structured to gain the attention of your organization?  Describe why you selected the structure you did? *Please refer to the APA template for assignment submission Again I will attached my my organization selected from week 1
please I have attached 4 document
STUDENT USE ONLY Copyright 2020, Ervin Frenzel Student: (LastName)_____________________(FirstName)_______________ Class______________________Section______________Semester:_______________ ____ Week:________________Project: ___________________________________ Copyright 2020, Ervin Frenzel Instructions: For identifying SIEM/Security pr oducts: Identify and rank 10 components (data sets or logs) that can be imported to a SIEM – rank them upon, do this with 2 separate SIEM products (LogRythm, Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, AlienVault, NuSiem, Dell SecureWorks, Rapid 7) Rank according to Application Programming Interface (API): API rating “0” – Data integration is not possible with non – proprietary data sets API rating “1” – manual retrieval of information API rating “2” – We can produce API API rating “3” – Community will produce API API rating “4” – Organization will produce and deploy API API rating “5” – Existing API produced and backed by Vendor For Cost Associations (Highest cost to Lowest cost): 1 – ________________ to _________________ (example over $50,000) 2 – ________________ to _________________ (example $40,000 to $49,999) 3 – ________________ to _________________ (example $25,000 to $39,999) 4 – ________________ to _________________ (example $10,000 to $24,999) 5 – ________________ to __________ _______ (example under $9,999) For Identifying Indicators of Compromise (IoC): Rank according to : 1 – N o association (validated or confirmed ) 2 – S uspected not association 3 – A ssociation unknown (status unknown) 4 – S uspected association 5 – Association confirmed (validated or confirmed)
please I have attached 4 document
All discussion from week 1-5 to give an idea to what we discused Discusion:1 DQ1: How does OSINT contribute to the overall security picture? DQ2: What is a collection plan? Why would an organization/you need one? Discussion 2 DQ1: Why is the screening process so integral to the overall interrogation process?   DQ2: How would you adapt this process for cybersecurity work? Discussion 3 What is a Google dork? What is it used in? Is it helpful for hacking? Discussion 4 DQ1: You want to use Google dorks to footprint the site but only want results that show file extensions, what Google dork operators would you use, and why? Discussion 5 What are some common pitfalls of intelligence analysis, and how can you avoid them? I will also submit some paper from assignment we did through the semester to give an idea. This for assignment 2 Als I will attached my organization