LopesWrite Technical Support articles<\/a> for assistance. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Criteria<\/p>\n
Achievement Levels<\/p>\n
Description<\/p>\n
Percentage<\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n0.00 %<\/p>\n
Less Than Satisfactory<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n75.00 %<\/p>\n
Satisfactory<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n79.00 %<\/p>\n
Good<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n89.00 %<\/p>\n
Excellent<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n100.00 %<\/p>\n
Content<\/span><\/p>\n80.0<\/p>\n
Clinical Manifestations of Mr. M.<\/span><\/p>\n10.0<\/span><\/p>\nClinical manifestations are omitted.<\/span><\/p>\nClinical manifestations are partially presented. There are major omissions and inaccuracies.<\/span><\/p>\nClinical manifestations are summarized. An overview of the general symptoms is presented. Some findings are incomplete.<\/span><\/p>\nSubjective and objective clinical manifestations are described. Overall, the clinical manifestations are accurate and reflect observed and perceived signs and symptoms.<\/span><\/p>\nSubjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed. The clinical manifestations are accurate and clearly report the observed and perceived signs and symptoms.<\/span><\/p>\nDiagnoses and Secondary Diagnoses<\/span><\/p>\n10.0<\/span><\/p>\nA discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is omitted; or, medical diagnoses presented are inaccurate.<\/span><\/p>\nA partial discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. There are major inaccuracies. Rationale and evidence for the diagnoses are lacking.<\/span><\/p>\nA general discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. There are some inaccuracies. A summary provides some rationale and evidence to explain why the diagnoses are relevant.<\/span><\/p>\nA discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. General rationale and relevant data are used to explain why the diagnoses should be considered. There are minor inaccuracies.<\/span><\/p>\nA detailed discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. Strong rationale and reliable data are used to explain why the diagnoses are relevant and should be considered.<\/span><\/p>\nExplanation of Expected Abnormalities During Nursing Assessment<\/span><\/p>\n15.0<\/span><\/p>\nA discussion of what abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is omitted; or, the expected findings are not relevant for the patient or his health status.<\/span><\/p>\nAn incomplete summary of some abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. There are inaccuracies. No rationale or evidence is provided for support.<\/span><\/p>\nA general discussion on the abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. There are minor inaccuracies. Some rationale or evidence is provided for support.<\/span><\/p>\nA discussion of abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. General rationale and evidence are provided for support.<\/span><\/p>\nA thorough discussion of abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. Strong rationale and evidence are provided for support.<\/span><\/p>\nEffects of Health Status on Physical, Psychological, and Emotional Aspects of Patient and Family<\/span><\/p>\n15.0<\/span><\/p>\nThe effects of the health status on the physical, psychological, and emotional aspects of the patent, and the impact the health status has on the family, are omitted.<\/span><\/p>\nThe effects of the health status on the physical, psychological, and emotional aspects of the patient, and the impact the health status has on the family, are partially summarized. The effects presented are questionable, and support for the discussion is not provided.<\/span><\/p>\nThe effects of the health status on the physical, psychological, and emotional aspects of the patient, and the impact the health status has on the family, are summarized. Overall, the described effects on the patient and impact to the family are relevant. Some support for the discussion is provided.<\/span><\/p>\nA discussion of the effects of the health status on the physical, psychological, and emotional aspects of the patient, and the impact the health status has on the family, is presented. Support for the discussion is provided.<\/span><\/p>\nA thorough discussion of the effects of the health status on the physical, psychological, and emotional aspects of the patient, and the impact the health status has on the family, is presented. Strong support for the discussion is provided.<\/span><\/p>\nInterventions for Support<\/span><\/p>\n15.0<\/span><\/p>\nInterventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are omitted.<\/span><\/p>\nSome interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are partially presented. More information is required.<\/span><\/p>\nSome interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.<\/span><\/p>\nKey interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity.<\/span><\/p>\nAll relevant interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are thoroughly discussed.<\/span><\/p>\nActual or Potential Problems Based on Condition<\/span><\/p>\n15.0<\/span><\/p>\nFewer than three actual or potential problems faced by the patient are presented. The problems posed are not relevant to his condition.<\/span><\/p>\nThree actual or potential problems faced by the patient are partially presented. It is unclear how some of the posed problems are relevant to his condition. There are inaccuracies.<\/span><\/p>\nAt least four actual or potential problems faced by the patient are summarized. The posed problems are generally relevant to his condition. There are minor inaccuracies. Some information or rationale is needed.<\/span><\/p>\nFour or more actual or potential problems faced by the patient are discussed. The posed problems are relevant to his condition. Rationale provided generally supports the discussion.<\/span><\/p>\nFour or more actual or potential problems faced by the patient are thoroughly discussed. The posed problems are clearly related to his condition. Strong rationale is provided and supports the discussion.<\/span><\/p>\nOrganization, Effectiveness, and Format<\/span><\/p>\n20.0<\/p>\n
Thesis Development and Purpose<\/span><\/p>\n5.0<\/span><\/p>\nPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/span><\/p>\nThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/span><\/p>\nThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/span><\/p>\nThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/span><\/p>\nThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/span><\/p>\nArgument Logic and Construction<\/span><\/p>\n5.0<\/span><\/p>\nStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/span><\/p>\nSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/span><\/p>\nArgument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/span><\/p>\nArgument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/span><\/p>\nClear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/span><\/p>\nMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/span><\/p>\n5.0<\/span><\/p>\nSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/span><\/p>\nFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.<\/span><\/p>\nSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.<\/span><\/p>\nProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.<\/span><\/p>\nWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/span><\/p>\nPaper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/span><\/p>\n2.0<\/span><\/p>\nTemplate is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/span><\/p>\nAppropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/span><\/p>\nAppropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/span><\/p>\nAppropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/span><\/p>\nAll format elements are correct.<\/span><\/p>\nDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/span><\/p>\n3.0<\/span><\/p>\nSources are not documented.<\/span><\/p>\nDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/span><\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/span><\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/span><\/p>\nSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/span><\/p>\nTotal Percentage 100<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It is necessary for an RN-BSN-prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of disease, the clinical manifestations and treatment protocols, and how they affect clients across the life span. Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mr. M., presented below. Based on this information, formulate a conclusion based on your […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_joinchat":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136489"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136489"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136489\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}