<\/p>\n
ASSIGNMENT 3: CASE STUDY\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Due date:
\nTime:
\nValue:
\nLength:
\nBased on:\n<\/p>\n
Sunday, 27 May 2018
\n23:59 hours (Australian Eastern Standard Time)
\n25%
\n2000 words \u00b1 10%
\nModules 8-10
\nLearning outcomes 1-3
\nElectronically through MyLO Assignment submission folder\n<\/p>\n
Submission:
\nBefore attempting this assignment:\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ensure the \u2018Assessment\u2019 section in this Unit Outline <\/em>is read and understood. If you have any Students should refer to the \u2018Guide to Assessment\u2019 file under the Content tab on the unit MyLO Ensure you understand the assignment question(s) and\/or tasks. Once again, consult your Note: All students are required to submit this assignment to be eligible to undertake the final Task description & requirements Complete the following task based on the attached case study Honeycutt Warehouse and Explain in details the tools, programmes or partnerships that Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping [25 marks]\n<\/p>\n See the Essay\/report assessment criteria sheet on the following page for information about the Department of Maritime and Logistics Management <\/em>\u2013 <\/em>JNB522 Business Logistics <\/em>18\n<\/p>\n Case: Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping Corporation\n<\/p>\n Source: Wisner, JD, Tan, K-C & Leong, GK 2019, Principles of supply chain management <\/em>\u2013 <\/em>a Department of Maritime and Logistics Management <\/em>\u2013 <\/em>JNB522 Business Logistics <\/em>19\n<\/p>\n Student: Unit title: Business Logistics\n<\/p>\n ID: Assignment 3 Marking Rubric\n<\/p>\n Assessment HD DN CR PP NN Explain the tools, Clearly explain Well explain with Mostly explain with Partially\/Shallowly Fail to identify Quality of research\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n All relevant Evidence of wide Main concepts etc Range of resources Main concepts etc Reasonable use of A number of Limited use of Majority of key Little\/no Quality of Logical structure Correct use of Acknowledged all Faultless Well organised Mostly correct use Acknowledge main Mostly accurate Prescribed style Well organised Some mistakes in Acknowledge some Reasonably Prescribed style Generally Numerous Acknowledge few Significantly Inconsistent Poor structure Difficult to read Sources poorly Incorrect Incorrect * Please note that the criteria listed above are not necessarily of equal weighting, nor are they all-inclusive; they give an ASSIGNMENT 3: CASE STUDY Due date: Time: Value: Length: Based on: Sunday, 27 May 2018 23:59 hours (Australian Eastern Standard Time) 25% 2000 words \u00b1 10% Modules 8-10 Learning outcomes 1-3 Electronically through MyLO Assignment submission folder Submission: Before attempting this assignment: Ensure the \u2018Assessment\u2019 section in this Unit Outline is read and understood. If […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_joinchat":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166075"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166075\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nquestions, please do not hesitate to contact the lecturer.\n<\/p>\n
\nsite for guidelines on assignment presentation.\n<\/p>\n
\nlecturer should you be unsure of any matters.\n<\/p>\n
\nunit examination.\n<\/p>\n
\n<\/em><\/p>\n
\nShipping Corporation <\/em>(Wisner et al., 2019), knowledge learned in this unit and other relevant
\ninformation.\n<\/p>\n
\nCorporation can use to improve logistics sustainability.\n<\/p>\n
\ncriteria and the standards by which your work will be judged.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\nbalanced approach<\/em>, 5th edn, Cengage, Boston, MA.\n<\/p>\n
\nUnit code: JNB522
\nAssessor: Vera Zhang\n<\/p>\n
\nMark: \/ 25\n<\/p>\n\n
\n \n
\nCriteria*\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\n(High distinction)\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\n(Distinction)\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\n(Credit)\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\n(Pass)\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n <\/p>\n
\n(Fail)\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n
\nprogrammes or
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nwith justification
\nthe potential
\ntools\/
\nprogrammes\/
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability with
\nexternal resources
\nthoroughly
\nresearched and
\neffectively applied\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\njustification the
\npotential tools\/
\nprogrammes\/
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability with
\nexternal resources
\nmostly researched
\nand applied\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\njustification the
\npotential tools\/
\nprogrammes\/
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability with
\nexternal resources
\nreasonably
\nresearched and
\napplied\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nexplain with
\njustification the
\npotential tools\/
\nprogrammes\/
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability with
\nlimited or external
\nresources\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nand analyse the
\npotential tools\/
\nprogrammes\/
\npartnerships to
\nimprove logistics
\nsustainability
\nwith effective
\nexternal
\nresources
\noverlooked or
\nmisunderstood\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n \n
\nconcepts etc
\nclearly explained\n<\/p>\n
\nreading &
\nindependent
\nresearch\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\ncovered and clearly
\nexplained\n<\/p>\n
\nused with
\ndiscrimination\n<\/p>\n\n<\/td>\n
\n
\ncovered but some
\nnot clearly
\nexplained\n<\/p>\n
\nsome quality
\nresources\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nimportant
\nconcepts etc
\noverlooked or
\ninsufficiently
\ndescribed\n<\/p>\n
\nsome quality
\nresources\n<\/p>\n\n<\/td>\n
\n <\/p>\n
\nconcepts not
\naddressed or
\nmisunderstood\n<\/p>\n
\nevidence of use
\nof resources\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n
\nCommunication\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nwith coherent,
\nconcise well
\ndeveloped
\nargument\n<\/p>\n
\ngrammar and
\ntechnically error-
\nfree\n<\/p>\n
\nsources\n<\/p>\n
\napplication of
\nprescribed style\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\nstructure with
\nargument, mostly
\nlogical, concise and
\ncoherent\n<\/p>\n
\nof grammar and
\nerror-free\n<\/p>\n
\nsources\n<\/p>\n
\nreferencing\n<\/p>\n
\napplied mostly
\ncorrect\n<\/p>\n\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nstructure and
\nargument, generally
\nlogical, concise and
\ncoherent\n<\/p>\n
\nthe use of grammar
\nand technical errors\n<\/p>\n
\nsources\n<\/p>\n
\naccurate
\nreferencing\n<\/p>\n
\nbasically applied
\nwith numerous
\nerrors\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
\norganised
\nstructure and in
\nsome areas
\nargument illogical
\nand unclear\n<\/p>\n
\ngrammar mistakes
\nand technical
\nerrors\n<\/p>\n
\nsources\n<\/p>\n
\ninconsistent
\nreferencing\n<\/p>\n
\napplication of
\nprescribed style\n<\/p>\n\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nand argument
\ngenerally illogical
\nand unclear\n<\/p>\n
\ndue to
\ngrammatical and
\ntechnical errors\n<\/p>\n
\nacknowledged\n<\/p>\n
\nreferencing style\n<\/p>\n
\nprescribed style\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\nindication of your performance. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"