\n Qualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions\n <\/p>\n
\n Choose 1 qualitative article and compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your review must include 2 sections (using Level I headings in current APA): (1) a summary of the article, and (2) a critical analysis of the article. All articles must be of studies conducted and published in the United States or Canada within the past 5 years.\n <\/p>\n
\n Your summary must include:\n <\/p>\n
\n Your analysis must include:\n <\/p>\n
\n See your textbook if you need more help evaluating your article. Remember to include a reference page. All citations and references must be in current APA format.\n <\/p>\n
\n https:\/\/canvas.liberty.edu\/courses\/136664\/modules#:~:text=External%20Url-,Read%3A%20Check%20%26%20Schutt%3A%20Chapter%209,-Read%3A%20Check%20%26%20Schutt\n <\/p>\n
\n https:\/\/canvas.liberty.edu\/courses\/136664\/modules#:~:text=External%20Url-,Read%3A%20Check%20%26%20Schutt%3A%20Chapter%2014,-Read%3A%20Qualitative%20Research\n <\/p>\n
\n https:\/\/canvas.liberty.edu\/courses\/136664\/files\/78372615\/download?download_frd=1\n <\/p>\n
\n https:\/\/canvas.liberty.edu\/courses\/136664\/modules#:~:text=Attachment-,Read%3A%20Qualitative%20Data%20Analysis,-Watch%3A%20Overview%20of\n <\/p>\n
\n https:\/\/cdnapisec.kaltura.com\/index.php\/extwidget\/preview\/partner_id\/2167581\/uiconf_id\/39959791\/entry_id\/1_at11a31c\/embed\/dynamic\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Qualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions Choose 1 qualitative article and compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your review must include 2 sections (usin
\nEDUC 750 Qualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions Choose 1 qualitative article and compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your review must include 2 sections (using Level I headings in current APA): (1) a summary of the article, and (2) a critical analysis of the article. All articles must be of studies conducted and published in the United States or Canada within the past 5 years. Your summary must include: The purpose of the study; A description of participants\/sample; The research design\/data analysis (narrative, grounded theory, case study, phenomenology, ethnography, etc.); The method of data collection (questionnaire, document analysis, observation, open-ended or structured interview, etc.); Analysis (Inductive\/deductive approach, point of focus, summaries, memoing, indexing, coding, grouping, themes, order of analysis, type of analysis (content, narrative, discourse, framework, grounded theory), and The results. Your analysis must include: Opportunities for further research not already stated in the article, Threats to validity or undocumented bias (credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability) on the part of the researcher(s), Other original insight or criticism, and Implications of the findings. See your textbook if you need more help evaluating your article. Remember to include a reference page. All citations and references must be in current APA format.
\nQualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions Choose 1 qualitative article and compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your review must include 2 sections (usin
\nEDUC 750 Qualitative Article Analysis Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Summary: Purpose of study, description of participants\/sample, research design, data collection and analysis, results 32 to 35 points Each section of the summary is clearly and concisely presented with rationale as to selection for the study, but fully summarized with citations as applicable to include. 29 to 31 points All sections of the summary are identified and supported with some rationale and\/or citations as applicable. 1 to 28 points Some sections of the summary are not evident or unclear. Not all information includes citations. 0 points Sections are incomplete, missing, lacking alignment, and lacking support. Analysis: Further research, validity, original insight\/criticism, implications 32 to 35 points The analysis provides multiple directions for further research. There is a complete and concise discussion of the validity\/rival hypotheses. Insight\/Criticism based on fact, research, or scholarly authority. There is a complete and concise discussion of the implications of research on practice. 29 to 31 points The analysis provides a few directions for further research. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes most aspects of the validity\/rival hypotheses. Generally good evidence given in support of insight\/criticism. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes implications for practice. 1 to 28 points Directions for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings. The validity\/rival hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects missing. Evidence only somewhat supports insight\/criticism. The discussion contains unclear implications for practice. 0 points There is an incomplete discussion of further research, validity\/rival hypotheses, or implications. Insight\/criticism is not entirely supported. No connection is made between research and practice. Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Grammar, Spelling and Page Count 14 to 15 points Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the review. There are 0\u20132 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Must have at least 3 pages. 13 points There are 3\u20135 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has 3 pages. 1 to 12 points There are 6\u201310 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has less than 3 pages. 0 points More than 10 errors that distract the reader from the content. Has only 1 page. Current APA Format Compliance 14 to 15 points There are 0\u20131 minor errors in current APA format in the required items. 13 points There are 2\u20133 minor errors in current APA format in the required items. 1 to 12 points There are more than 3 errors in current APA format in the required items. 0 points There are more than 5 errors in current APA format.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Qualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions Choose 1 qualitative article and compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your review must include 2 sections (using Level I headings in current APA): (1) a summary of the article, and (2) a critical analysis of the article. All articles must be of studies […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_joinchat":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304448"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}