\n

\n looking for someone good\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

looking for someone good
\n Unit 3 Video Summary, Analysis & Synthesis https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=84VyogMSuv0 After viewing the designated videos, summarize and evaluate the overall content of all by selecting\u00a0one\u00a0of the following: 1) writing a 2\u20133 paragraph, well-crafted narrative response, 2) making a detailed bulleted listing of the most important content presented,\u00a0OR\u00a03) create a detailed graphic overview \/ concept map of the major content and supporting details. Then, in a summary paragraph, synthesize the information learned and briefly compare the overall content, making at least 2 personal connections and providing at least 3 \u201cAha Moments.\u201d Science of Reading or Science of Teaching Reading Infographic Following the instructions provided, use the technology tool, Canva, to create an infographic that could be used with colleagues, parents, and other significant stakeholders to provide an overview of the philosophy and components Science of Reading \/ Science of Teaching Reading components and processes, focusing on how the parts work together to build and strengthen students\u2019 literacy skills. View the\u00a0rubric\u00a0to see how this will be evaluated. Canva Directions Handout.pdf\u00a0download Minimize File Preview Rubric Science of Reading (SOR) \/ Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric Science of Reading (SOR) \/ Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 10\u00a0to >9.0\u00a0pts Project includes an explanatory paragraph of introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 9\u00a0to >8.0\u00a0pts Project provides adequate introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 8\u00a0to >6.0\u00a0pts Project provides minimal introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 6\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts Project fails to include any form of introduction regarding the theory and practices of SOR. 10\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSOR\/ STR Process 35\u00a0to >31.5\u00a0pts Project reflects thorough and accurate explanation of all components of STR practices. 31.5\u00a0to >28.0\u00a0pts Project adequately addresses all steps of STR practices. 28\u00a0to >21.0\u00a0pts Project partially addresses steps of STR practices. 21\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts Project does not accurately explain steps of STR practices. 35\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDigital Images 25\u00a0to >22.5\u00a0pts Project includes at least 5 images related to components of SOR\/STR. 22.5\u00a0to >20.0\u00a0pts Project includes at least 4 relevant images related to components of SOR\/STR. 20\u00a0to >17.5\u00a0pts Project includes 2-3 relevant images related to components of SOR\/STR. 17.5\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts Project includes less than 2 relevant images related to components of SOR\/STR. 25\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat 15\u00a0to >13.5\u00a0pts Project is professionally presented with appropriate text formatting. 13.5\u00a0to >12.0\u00a0pts Project reflects adequate text formatting. 12\u00a0to >10.5\u00a0pts Project reflects minimal attention to appropriate text formatting. 10.5\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts Project is poorly formatted. 15\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 15\u00a0to >13.5\u00a0pts No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 13.5\u00a0to >12.0\u00a0pts 1-2 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 12\u00a0to >10.5\u00a0pts 3-4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 10.5\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts More than 4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 15\u00a0pts Total Points:\u00a0100 PreviousNext<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

looking for someone good looking for someone good Unit 3 Video Summary, Analysis & Synthesis https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=84VyogMSuv0 After viewing the designated videos, summarize and evaluate the overall content of all by selecting\u00a0one\u00a0of the following: 1) writing a 2\u20133 paragraph, well-crafted narrative response, 2) making a detailed bulleted listing of the most important content presented,\u00a0OR\u00a03) create a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_joinchat":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319966"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qualityassignments.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}