looking for someone good

looking for someone good
Unit 3 Video Summary, Analysis & Synthesis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84VyogMSuv0 After viewing the designated videos, summarize and evaluate the overall content of all by selecting one of the following: 1) writing a 2–3 paragraph, well-crafted narrative response, 2) making a detailed bulleted listing of the most important content presented, OR 3) create a detailed graphic overview / concept map of the major content and supporting details. Then, in a summary paragraph, synthesize the information learned and briefly compare the overall content, making at least 2 personal connections and providing at least 3 “Aha Moments.” Science of Reading or Science of Teaching Reading Infographic Following the instructions provided, use the technology tool, Canva, to create an infographic that could be used with colleagues, parents, and other significant stakeholders to provide an overview of the philosophy and components Science of Reading / Science of Teaching Reading components and processes, focusing on how the parts work together to build and strengthen students’ literacy skills. View the rubric to see how this will be evaluated. Canva Directions Handout.pdf download Minimize File Preview Rubric Science of Reading (SOR) / Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric Science of Reading (SOR) / Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 10 to >9.0 pts Project includes an explanatory paragraph of introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 9 to >8.0 pts Project provides adequate introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 8 to >6.0 pts Project provides minimal introduction on the theory and practices of SOR. 6 to >0 pts Project fails to include any form of introduction regarding the theory and practices of SOR. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSOR/ STR Process 35 to >31.5 pts Project reflects thorough and accurate explanation of all components of STR practices. 31.5 to >28.0 pts Project adequately addresses all steps of STR practices. 28 to >21.0 pts Project partially addresses steps of STR practices. 21 to >0 pts Project does not accurately explain steps of STR practices. 35 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDigital Images 25 to >22.5 pts Project includes at least 5 images related to components of SOR/STR. 22.5 to >20.0 pts Project includes at least 4 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR. 20 to >17.5 pts Project includes 2-3 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR. 17.5 to >0 pts Project includes less than 2 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat 15 to >13.5 pts Project is professionally presented with appropriate text formatting. 13.5 to >12.0 pts Project reflects adequate text formatting. 12 to >10.5 pts Project reflects minimal attention to appropriate text formatting. 10.5 to >0 pts Project is poorly formatted. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 15 to >13.5 pts No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 13.5 to >12.0 pts 1-2 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 12 to >10.5 pts 3-4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 10.5 to >0 pts More than 4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 15 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext